Comments on: More surveillance please, we’re British http://durband.com/blog/214/more-surveillance-please-were-british.html Mark’s tedious weblog Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:54:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Mark http://durband.com/blog/214/more-surveillance-please-were-british.html/comment-page-1#comment-97 Mark Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:27:23 +0000 http://www.durband.com/blog/?p=214#comment-97 A Manchester professional services representative group called pro.manchester (made up of over 280 member firms in sectors such as accountantcy, banking, legal and construction) has decided to keep secret the results of a ballot of members on congestion charging. They had previously said they would publish the results, but now even those who voted are being denied this information. Meanwhile, the <a href="http://www.gmmgroup.co.uk/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Greater Manchester Momentum Group</a> rightly continues campaigning for the rejection of the current congestion charging proposals. In December 2008, all Greater Manchester residents will be asked to vote in a public referendum. In the meantime, residents and businesses can <a href="http://www.gmfuturetransport.co.uk/consultation/response/" target ="_blank" rel="nofollow">have their say online</a>. A Manchester professional services representative group called pro.manchester (made up of over 280 member firms in sectors such as accountantcy, banking, legal and construction) has decided to keep secret the results of a ballot of members on congestion charging. They had previously said they would publish the results, but now even those who voted are being denied this information.

Meanwhile, the Greater Manchester Momentum Group rightly continues campaigning for the rejection of the current congestion charging proposals.

In December 2008, all Greater Manchester residents will be asked to vote in a public referendum. In the meantime, residents and businesses can have their say online.

]]>